Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shehrose Mian's avatar

Well-written though the elaboration on the decision tree needs logical balancing. Examples for all critical divergences for relevant disjunctions would be useful. In practice, the OODA loop should deal more with antagonistic *behaviors* than personified “adversaries”, as one would miss out on converting a potential threat into a source of resonant intelligence. Moreover, misapplying OODA by over-philosophizing threat detection (in zero-sum competitive frameworks that are pre-biased cognitively to begin with) in favor of one’s escapably unfalsifiable self-interest could produce adversarial behavior in the first place. For instance, chess statistically favors the first attacker, hence the overall cognitive net loss of such a pastime. Shaolin martial arts prove more morally and militarily robust anyhow for the kinds of threats invoked by the example here — without a need for IQ motivations (which — in my view — end up conatively hyper-resonating, creating social imbalance and increasing social entropy at the expense of overall human longevity).

Expand full comment

No posts